Boze: Why the team name Redskins is not offensive

By KTTH | June 18, 2014

What are good criteria for naming a sports team? You want something strong and cool, something that evokes power, domination, and speed – something that fans will want to identify with, right?

In Green Bay, they named their team after hardworking local meat packers. In New England, the Patriots evoke the region’s Revolutionary War roots. Here in Seattle, we have the Mariners, the rough-and-tough sea-faring men who haul fish and other goods.

In short, you don’t name your team after something you don’t respect, be it a lion or a soldier.

It’s for that reason host David Boze is disagreeing with the decision Wednesday by the U.S. Patent and Trademark office to revoke six trademarks held by the Washington Redskins – a decision that essentially renders the team’s name and logo useless, open for anyone to use freely.

“I just find it so absurd, the federal government couldn’t get their way in something” – a group of lawmakers tried to urge Redskins owners to change the name – “so the feds step in and say sorry, we found this to be disparaging,” Boze said.

“The problem I have with this is you don’t name a team after an individual you want to disparage.”


There’s also some debate about whether the term “redskin” is even racially offensive.

According to the reference book “Color of Words: An Encyclopedic Dictionary of Ethnic Bias in the United States,” the word redskin is “regarded as highly offensive.” However, an Annenberg Public Policy Center poll showed that 90 percent of Indians in the U.S. did not agree.

In fact, the media have stated that Indians use the term “redskin” as a term of affection; like how blacks use the N-word. And, linguist Ives Goddard of the University of Memphis found that the word, “when it first appeared as an English expression in the early 1800s, it came in the most respectful context and at the highest level.”

In the case of the N-word, “it was very clearly the idea that here was racial inferiority,” Boze said of that epithet. “With the Redskins, when you’ve got people of all different colors, shapes, and sizes want to emulate the team, that doesn’t make any sense. They’re saying, ‘Hey, I want to be like our mascot here,’ and they’re extoling its virtues.

“The argument is that there’s no defense whatsoever of the name Redskins. I’m a Seahawks fan, so I don’t have any skin in the game – pun intended. But I don’t like arguments that don’t make any sense. Can you think of any given professional sports team where you name yourself after something you’re meant to despise?”

Maybe not yet – the Redskins could change the team name to the Tax Collectors.

comments powered by Disqus
Top stories

Don't miss
  • debate
    Freedom Series - The First 100 Days Michael Medved, Todd Herman, Chairman of the King County Republican Party Lori Sotelo, and Former State Representative, County Councilman, and GOP State Chairman Chris Vance debate President Trump's first 100 Days at the Washington State History Museum in Tacoma.

Don't miss
  • debate
    Audio: The Fight For the White House Ben Shapiro, Michael Medved and David Boze analyze the current crop of GOP presidential hopefuls, with an eye towards who can best take back the White House and defeat Hillary Clinton. Moderated by Jason Rantz.

Don't miss
  • debate
    Video: Gun rights debate In KTTH’s third Freedom Series Debate, hosts Ben Shapiro and Michael Medved sat down with KIRO Radio’s Dave Ross and Ralph Fascitelli, President of Washington Ceasefire, to take on initiatives 594 and 591 and other gun rights issues.

Don't miss

Don't miss

Real Estate Corner
  • Robin's Real Estate Reality Talk
    Robin's Real Estate Reality Talk We are in a very unique market. Right now our area is showing signs of recovery. We are moving in a positive direction and gaining equity though are ways off from where we were in 2006 and 2007.