Calling it “entertaining” and “informative” Ben Shapiro offers his dissection of the KTTH minimum wage debate from Wednesday night. Listen to Ben break down the entire debate here.
So, is the issue settled? Did conservatism trounce socialism at Wednesday night’s KTTH minimum wage debate at McCaw Hall at the Seattle Center?
Not exactly. As with most debates, there was no clear winner, although the KTTH debate was an excellent showcase for the opposing ideologies – and the two sides even agreed on some points.
Socialist Seattle Councilwoman Kshama Sawant and Rebecca Smith, deputy director of the National Employment Law Project, argued in favor of the $15 wage. They focused on the injustice of large corporations that could afford to raise wages, but don’t, and rely on federal and state governments to subsidize wages with food stamps and Medicaid.
KTTH host Ben Shapiro and Washington Policy Center vice president Paul Guppy stuck to the economics of the issue – with Shapiro providing a lot of humor, too – and raised one important issue that’s been missing from the debate: consent. That is, that the employer-employee relationship is – and should remain – consensual; when the government interferes, the relationship becomes non-consensual.
For example, if an employer offers you $7.25 per hour – the federal minimum – you have the power to say no or ask for more. If the employer won’t give you more, you can decline the job. That’s consent.
However, Sawant and Smith said that there’s a power imbalance, where jobs that pay the minimum are the most common, and that it’s hard for an employee to turn down a job if they need money to live.
A pre-debate reception in a VIP area on the fourth floor of McCaw Hall allowed attendees to mingle with Shapiro, Boze, and Guppy. As waiters walked around serving glazed chicken wings, tiny hamburgers, and Caesar-salads-on-a-stick, tech entrepreneurs Jeff Gough and Dan Deering were excited for the debate. They hoped that Shapiro would rule on Sawant and Smith.
“I think [Shapiro] has the truth on his side – that’s a big advantage in this,” Gough said.
“We’re both small business owners, and we’re concerned about wage and tax issues. Over the years, we’ve become more educated on how wage laws work, so we’re interested in hearing a good debate,” Deering said.
Though they pay all of their employees more than $15 per hour, they said they did hire a high school student at $12 per hour to do work around their office. If minimum wage increased to $15, they said, it would not be worthwhile to hire someone like that, effectively limiting one person’s opportunity to gain work experience.
“[The $15 minimum wage] reduces opportunities,” Deering said.
Tyler and Mike Mullen, father and son, both from Bothell, said that they came to the debate for excitement, and were admittedly fans of the Boze and Shapiro shows on KTTH.
Tyler Mullen said that he wanted to give Sawant and Smith an opportunity to explain their position on the $15 wage before he makes up his mind on the issue – though he was skeptical of Sawant, and wanted to ask the Councilwoman what her net worth is since she was formerly married to a Microsoft employee.
“Having a minimum wage at all is a bad idea,” Mike Mullen said. “It doesn’t give young people a place to start out. At $15 you’ll have more competition and no jobs for them at all.”
The debate began with a little after 7:30 p.m. with an act of truce by KTTH host and debate moderator David Boze.
“Can we all agree: we’d like to see people earn more money, and see less poverty?” Boze asked.
The four panelists agreed.
Boze acknowledged his bias against the $15 minimum wage, but said he sought help from KIRO FM morning news anchor Dave Ross in finding questions that would challenge the conservative position.
His first question did that, asking Shapiro why he objects to raising minimum wage if so many minimum wage workers rely on government entitlements to make ends meet.
“That’s 100 percent true,” Shapiro said. But, he said, raising the minimum wage would not end that practice. A better solution would be to cut those entitlements, forcing large companies to compete fairly.
Sawant responded by saying that big businesses are gaming the system “at the expense of small businesses.” But that the problem isn’t the entitlements, but the “problem of inequality” where “half of people eligible for food stamps are working people” and that “small businesses will benefit from having consumers” who can pay for their products.
“If we increase the minimum wage to $15, a family of three would get near zero in food stamps, relieving the problem,” Smith said.
The crowd was favorable toward Shapiro and Guppy, and showed support for them by grumbling loudly, jeering, or throwing up hands when they heard Sawant or Smith say something they didn’t like. However, there was a contingent of $15 Now supporters in the audience, though the crowd mostly drowned out their applause for Smith and Sawant.
In fact, the crowd got so interruptive at points that Shapiro had to wave them off so Sawant or Smith could finish a point.
“Sawant has guts for showing up to a venue with a crowd adverse to her position. It was an intellectually stimulating and passionate debate,” Shapiro said after the debate.
Before the debate, Toya Chester, an organizer with the $15 Now campaign, was operating a table in front of the debate hall. Chester noted that there were fewer $15 Now supporters than they usually see at events. She was also skeptical of the debate, wondering whether it was just a way to make fun of Sawant, socialism, and the idea of a high minimum wage.
“I’d like to ask if it’s fair for people to work full-time and still not be able to live [on the wages],” Chester said when asked what question she would ask of the opposing side. “Is it fair that companies are seeing record profits but there have been no record raises?”
One question from an audience member asked whether there’s a bipartisan consensus on minimum wage, since a national poll of Republicans and Democrats showed around 70 percent support for a raise.
Guppy responded, saying that there’s only a bipartisan consensus because the poll question is not “should we force all businesses to pay people $15?” but, “do you support businesses agreeing to increase the minimum wage?”
One of the final questions asked what happens if someone’s labor is not worth $15. What does an employer do then?
Smith said that wages are based on power, challenging the consent-labor pact Shapiro and Guppy talked about. Smith said that wages are based on employers having more power than employees do. The $15 wage can fix that imbalance. A metaphor that Shapiro used throughout the debate said that using government to increase the minimum wage, essentially, puts a gun to the temple of employers.
“I was glad that Councilwoman Sawant seemed to fully embrace her socialism, even espousing hunter-gatherer societies for their equality over modern inequality; I was disappointed, however, that her consistent ideology seemed to collapse when it came to implementation, making her a gradualist similar to her Democrat colleagues rather than the full-scale socialist she appears to be,” Shapiro said after the debate.
After the debate, Jeff Gough and Dan Deering felt that the conservative side had won. Gough was skeptical of Sawant because, he said, she didn’t back up her points with data.
“The crux was the consensual vs. force,” Gough said.
“It seemed like there was more morality as opposed to [whether a $15 minimum wage] is good or bad for the economy,” Deering said.
Refugees a threat to culture? The Dalai Lama thinks soAugust 17, 2016
Trump a 'no-show' on our showAugust 17, 2016
Ted Cruz compares Congress to 'The Godfather' moviesMay 2, 2016v
Trump's California campaign manager says nomination nearly clinchedApril 27, 2016The Republican presidential front-runner’s California campaign manager, Tim Clark, told “Armstrong and Getty” that the upcoming primary in Indiana might be the final tipping point, if it hasn’t already happened.
How much is GOP leadership willing to rewrite the rules to block Donald Trump?March 23, 2016The first rule of the Republican Convention is there are no rules. But Tim Carney, senior political columnist for the Washington Examiner, wonders how much Republican leadership is willing to bend this year in order to block Donald Trump from winning the nomination.
Are body cameras just be another way for the government to humiliate you?March 17, 2016There are plenty of potential benefits to officers wearing body cameras, but Jack Armstrong worries that it might just be another way for the government to humiliate you.
Todd Herman: My promises to the listeners of KTTHSeptember 1, 2015Might we start our relationship with some promises from me to you?
Ben Shapiro explains his departure from AM 770 KTTHAugust 20, 2015
Ben Shapiro announces he's leaving AM 770 KTTHAugust 19, 2015
Tim Eyman turns in signatures for most 'destructive initiative yet'July 10, 2015Tim Eyman's latest campaign could place legislators in a tough position if passed later this year.
Catastrophic climate change in Seattle?July 10, 2015Michael Medved asks does sunny summer weather mean catastrophic climate change?
The Constitution had nothing to do with itJuly 1, 2015The worst part of the Supreme Court's redefinition of marriage is the failure to connect this decision to the Constitution.
Honor heritage with the right flagJuly 10, 2015Michael Medved says why not honor the South by flying the flag under which Southerners fought heroically in all our wars
Good news: We'll all get to fire Donald TrumpJune 17, 2015Michael Medved says the bottom line is, do you really want this Donald Trump's finger on the nuclear trigger?
The key target of Hillary's campaign: White womenJune 14, 2015Clinton's campaign remains confident because of their candidate's strength among one crucial group in the electorate.
Media distortions fuel spike in murdersJune 11, 2015Medved says a focus on police shootings involving black males served to spread false idea cops are threat to black people.
Michael Medved announces he's cancer-freeJune 3, 2015Four months after announcing to his listeners he was battling stage three throat cancer, Michael Medved announced he's officially cancer-free.
Worries over government shutdown are sillyJune 9, 2015David Boze says get ready to be angry, specifically at the state Legislature
Blunting the Democrats' 'youth advantage'June 2, 2015The recent Democratic winning streak in presidential elections connects directly to the "youth advantage"
Fight for white house
Audio: The Fight For the White House Ben Shapiro, Michael Medved and David Boze analyze the current crop of GOP presidential hopefuls, with an eye towards who can best take back the White House and defeat Hillary Clinton. Moderated by Jason Rantz.
KTTH gun rights debate
Video: Gun rights debate In KTTH’s third Freedom Series Debate, hosts Ben Shapiro and Michael Medved sat down with KIRO Radio’s Dave Ross and Ralph Fascitelli, President of Washington Ceasefire, to take on initiatives 594 and 591 and other gun rights issues.
KTTH religious freedom debate
Video: Religious freedom debate Watch the debate between Ben Shapiro, James Wellman, Valerie Tarico, Rev. Monica Corsaro, and Michael Medved.
KTTH Debate Video
Video: Minimum wage debate Watch the debate between host Ben Shapiro and Socialist Seattle Councilwoman Kshama Sawant.
Real Estate Corner
Robin's Real Estate Reality Talk We are in a very unique market. Right now our area is showing signs of recovery. We are moving in a positive direction and gaining equity though are ways off from where we were in 2006 and 2007.