How do you debate a liberal who is determined to paint you as a racist, sexist, homophobe who still believes the Earth is flat?
For the answer, we look to KTTH host Ben Shapiro, fabled agitator of leftists everywhere. Shapiro has figured out a winning formula to defeat flawed leftist rhetoric.
On Oct. 3, 2013, Shapiro gave a groundbreaking lecture at the University of California San Diego’s David Horowitz Freedom Center called “How to Debate a Liberal,” a systematic guide to trouncing a lefty opponent.
Want a free eBook of Shapiro’s “How to Debate a Liberal” lesson? Click here to sign up to be a member – it’s free! – at Shapiro’s Truth Revolt website.
Shapiro opened his lecture with a useful lesson from recent political history: that Republicans lost the 2012 presidential election not because of policy, but because Democrats were able to frame Mitt Romney as a “bad guy,” and Barack Obama as a “nice guy.”
It’s a common leftist “bully tactic,” Shapiro says, that you must outmaneuver in order to win the debate.
Here are Shapiro’s steps to winning an argument against a liberal.
EMBRACE THE FIRE
Politics is war, Shapiro says, crediting his late friend Andrew Brietbart. So, if you’re going to get into a debate with a liberal, be ready to punch them hard – but also be willing to sustain a few punches yourself.
“You have to be willing to take the first punch,” Shapiro said.
Of course, that’s a rhetorical punch. You can land a hard one with the next step.
FRAME YOUR OPPONENT
Discussing gun control with liberal CNN host Piers Morgan on live TV in January 2013, Shapiro scored a near knockout in the first few seconds of the debate by framing his opponent. He accused Morgan of standing on the graves of murdered children to further his anti-gun agenda.
The result? Shapiro appeared as the victor in the debate, and as a reasonable, levelheaded, and competent opponent. Turn your lefty opponent’s ludicrous tactics against them by framing them as the bad guy.
FRAME THE DEBATE
Just as important as step No. 2 is putting your opponent on the defensive by framing the debate in a way that they are unfamiliar with, Shapiro says.
If the debate is about global warming, do not debate on whether it is manmade. Rather, debate about what policies can solve it.
If you are debating gun rights, prepare yourself for the standard liberal argument, which is that we don’t need guns at all. Instead, ask them what we can do to curb gun violence, and violence as a whole.
“You have to frame the debate in ways they’re not familiar with,” Shapiro said. “Otherwise, it turns into a character argument. You’re a flat-Earther, you’re corrupt, you’re mean, you’re stupid – these are the lines of [liberal] attack.”
SPOT THEIR INCONSISTENCIES
Every single leftist argument is full of inconsistencies. They claim they want marriage equality, but at the same time they want to force churches to endorse an irreligious practice; they want universal government-sponsored health care, but they do not support forcing people to become doctors, which would be necessarily to support such a massive program.
The positive thing is this irrational logic is easy to spot. Do not be afraid to point out these wacky contradictions.
FORCE THEM TO ANSWER QUESTIONS
Sure, liberals love to put conservatives on the defense by forcing them to answer questions, but do liberals have to answer?
Force them to answer questions. If they are pro-gay marriage, ask them which parent is less vital to a family: the mother or the father. Chances are, they’ll have to concede that a family is better with a mother and a father, not just one or the other. And, if they’re for the separation of church and state, ask them if they think government should be forced to perform same-sex marriages.
DON’T GET DISTRACTED
Liberals love George W. Bush. That is, they love to invoke his name to prove that Republicans and conservatives are incompetent. Ignore weak rhetorical tactics. Stay focused on the debate at hand, not left field references that leftists use to make you look weak.
YOU DON’T HAVE TO DEFEND ALL CONSERVATIVES
It’s not your job to defend every conservative. Conservatives are human and often do any say things you might not always disagree with. Just because you voted for someone and largely agree with their views doesn’t mean you have to defend them.
If your liberal opponent wants to bring up something Reagan did or said 30 years ago, tell them to build a time machine. If you stand around defending every conservative ever, you’re going to waste a bunch of time and energy.
IF YOU DO NOT KNOW SOMETHING, ADMIT IT
You are not an oracle, and you’re not Google. You don’t need to know everything.
If a liberal challenges you on a topic you’re unfamiliar with, politely decline to talk about it. You’re allowed.
“If you don’t know something, don’t discuss the topic,” Shapiro said. “Say, ‘I haven’t researched it sufficiently.’ If they insist, tell them that they’re being unfair.
“Ego will kill you in these kinds of debates.”
LET THEM HAVE MEANINGLESS VICTORIES
Do you stand for diversity? Of course, why not?
Are you in favor of immigration reform? You betcha.
Conceding certain points to a liberal will accomplish several things. First, it puts them off guard. When they ask you if you support immigration reform, they’re expecting you to say “no,” which would allow them to accuse you of being a racist. The thing is the term “immigration reform” is essentially meaningless, which allows you to agree with it without conceding your position.
Second, it will make the liberal think you are more of a moderate, which has the effect of softening their rhetorical attack.
Above all, remember that leftists are not there to debate you; they are there to use you to prove that conservatism is a radical ideology that professes racist, sexist ideals. It isn’t true, of course, but you can’t win an argument with someone who hates you for your beliefs.
Instead, debate liberals on substance and policy, Shapiro says.
“The left has only one play,” Shapiro says. “The play is ‘you’re nasty.’”
The Constitution had nothing to do with itJuly 1, 2015The worst part of the Supreme Court's redefinition of marriage is the failure to connect this decision to the Constitution.
Good news: We'll all get to fire Donald TrumpJune 17, 2015Michael Medved says the bottom line is, do you really want this Donald Trump's finger on the nuclear trigger?
'Freedom Series:' Fight for the White HouseJuly 1, 2015The next AM 770 KTTH “Freedom Series” event, "The Fight for the White House” will take place the evening of Wednesday, July 29.
The key target of Hillary's campaign: White womenJune 14, 2015Clinton's campaign remains confident because of their candidate's strength among one crucial group in the electorate.
Media distortions fuel spike in murdersJune 11, 2015Medved says a focus on police shootings involving black males served to spread false idea cops are threat to black people.
Michael Medved announces he's cancer-freeJune 3, 2015Four months after announcing to his listeners he was battling stage three throat cancer, Michael Medved announced he's officially cancer-free.
Worries over government shutdown are sillyJune 9, 2015David Boze says get ready to be angry, specifically at the state Legislature
Blunting the Democrats' 'youth advantage'June 2, 2015The recent Democratic winning streak in presidential elections connects directly to the "youth advantage"
Seattle's desire to make housing more affordable could backfire on property ownersMay 26, 2015It could become more of a hassle to be a rental-property owner in Seattle if two pieces of legislation are approved.
Hey, police, don't let Seattle become LAMay 21, 2015Crime in Seattle's south precinct is down by 25 percent compared to this time last year.
Insecure parents and Ivy League degreesMay 18, 2015Michael Medved says blue-chip degrees for your children can offer reassurance that you've done something right.
Is Ted Cruz authentically Cuban?May 13, 2015David Boze gets the sense that Mark Halperin is trying to prove something about the validness of Ted Cruz's background.
No basis for 'third party' envyMay 11, 2015Many Americans watched recent elections in Britain with envy because so many parties competed for power.
Former teacher says job is tough, but not enough to walk outMay 8, 2015Teachers have it tough, but they shouldn't walk out on the job, according to one former teacher.
Seattle, port in 'giant political game'May 7, 2015Mayor Ed Murray will use the power of the city to give Shell a chance for a 'pause.'
Racism defined four different ways at KTTH Freedom DebateMay 4, 2015How can America have a conversation about racism when some of our best and brightest can't agree on its definition?
Rare criticism for ObamaApril 30, 2015Former President George W. Bush has offered some rare criticism for President Obama
Clinton quid pro quoApril 27, 2015A deal enabled Russia to purchase about 20% of the U.S. uranium supply for the possible quid pro quo of Clinton Foundation donations.
The scary reasons students would vote for HillaryApril 23, 2015Hillary Clinton appears to have the student vote at the University of Washington sewn up for one reason.
Michael Medved discusses recovery from throat cancerApril 20, 2015Michael Medved is improving and eager to return to the airwaves, as he told 770 AM KTTH's Greg Tomlin.
KTTH gun rights debate
Video: Gun rights debate In KTTH’s third Freedom Series Debate, hosts Ben Shapiro and Michael Medved sat down with KIRO Radio’s Dave Ross and Ralph Fascitelli, President of Washington Ceasefire, to take on initiatives 594 and 591 and other gun rights issues.
KTTH religious freedom debate
Video: Religious freedom debate Watch the debate between Ben Shapiro, James Wellman, Valerie Tarico, Rev. Monica Corsaro, and Michael Medved.
KTTH Debate Video
Video: Minimum wage debate Watch the debate between host Ben Shapiro and Socialist Seattle Councilwoman Kshama Sawant.
Real Estate Corner
Robin's Real Estate Reality Talk We are in a very unique market. Right now our area is showing signs of recovery. We are moving in a positive direction and gaining equity though are ways off from where we were in 2006 and 2007.